Ari Lanin, Monica K. Loseman, Brian M. Lutz, Mary Beth Maloney, Julia Lapitskaya, Colin B. Davis, Jonathan D. Fortney, Mark H. Mixon, Jr.
January 24, 2026
Delaware Legislature Codifies Safe Harbors for Controller Transactions and Moderates Inspection Demands

3 min
AI-made summary
- On March 25, 2025, Delaware enacted Senate Bill 21, amending Sections 144 and 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
- The changes lower judicial scrutiny of controlling stockholder transactions and limit investors’ access to company books and records, increasing the burden on stockholders seeking such information
- The amendments apply to acts or transactions after February 17, 2025, and aim to address concerns about corporations leaving Delaware for other jurisdictions.
Note: This updates and supersedes a prior alert (available here).~~On March 25, 2025, amendments were adopted by the Delaware legislature and signed into law that both lower Delaware courts’ scrutiny of controlling stockholder transactions and moderate the scope of investors’ access to company books and records. Senate Bill 21 (SB21) amends Sections 144 and 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL). The amendments apply to all acts or transactions, except for litigations pending or inspection demands made on or before February 17, 2025.~~These amendments follow mounting concerns in Delaware about “DExit”—the actual and potential departures of Delaware-incorporated corporations from the State for jurisdictions perceived to be more friendly to certain types of corporations.[1] By enhancing clarity and facilitating proactive evaluation of director appointments, conflicts cleansing, and transactional planning, SB21 continues Delaware’s long history of modernizing its corporate law in response to market developments.~~Amendments to Section 144~~Amendments to Section 144 of the DGCL significantly change how controlling stockholder transactions are reviewed by the court.[2] The amendments also strengthen the presumption that a public company director is disinterested and independent.~~.</>~~Amendments to Section 220~~Following judicial expansion of stockholder inspection rights in recent years, corporations have increasingly been subjected to invasive demands for an ever-widening range of corporate records, including director, officer, or management communications that in some cases courts have permitted for inspection. SB21 amendments to Section 220 of the DGCL narrow the scope of books and records available to stockholders and increase the burden on stockholders for obtaining such records.~~Stay Tuned~~Gibson Dunn will continue monitoring these developments as they are interpreted and applied in litigation.~~[1] For example, following Tesla’s reincorporation in Texas, TradeDesk reincorporated in Nevada, Dropbox filed notice that it is in the process of reincorporating in Nevada, and other controller-led companies announced they are considering reincorporation.~~[2] The amendments also provide a safe harbor for an act or transaction for which a majority of directors are conflicted—for example, decisions regarding director compensation—if such act or transaction is approved by a special committee of at least two disinterested, independent directors or approved or ratified by disinterested stockholders, in each case on a fully informed basis.~~The following Gibson Dunn lawyers prepared this update: Ari Lanin, Monica K. Loseman, Brian M. Lutz, Mary Beth Maloney, Julia Lapitskaya, Colin B. Davis, Jonathan D. Fortney, and Mark H. Mixon, Jr.~~Gibson Dunn lawyers are available to assist in addressing any questions you may have regarding these developments. Please contact the Gibson Dunn lawyer with whom you usually work, the authors, or any of the following Securities Litigation, Mergers and Acquisitions, Private Equity, or Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance practice group leaders and members:~~Securities Litigation: Colin B. Davis – Orange County (+1 949.451.3993, cdavis@gibsondunn.com) Jonathan D. Fortney – New York (+1 212.351.2386, jfortney@gibsondunn.com) Monica K. Loseman – Denver (+1 303.298.5784, mloseman@gibsondunn.com) Brian M. Lutz – San Francisco (+1 415.393.8379, blutz@gibsondunn.com) Mary Beth Maloney – New York (+1 212.351.2315, mmaloney@gibsondunn.com) Mark H. Mixon, Jr. – New York (+1 212.351.2394, mmixon@gibsondunn.com) Craig Varnen – Los Angeles (+1 213.229.7922, cvarnen@gibsondunn.com)~~Mergers and Acquisitions: Robert B. Little – Dallas (+1 214.698.3260, rlittle@gibsondunn.com) Saee Muzumdar – New York (+1 212.351.3966, smuzumdar@gibsondunn.com) George Sampas – New York (+1 212.351.6300, gsampas@gibsondunn.com)~~Private Equity: Richard J. Birns – New York (+1 212.351.4032, rbirns@gibsondunn.com) Wim De Vlieger – London (+44 20 7071 4279, wdevlieger@gibsondunn.com) Federico Fruhbeck Jr. – London (+44 20 7071 4230, ffruhbeck@gibsondunn.com) Ari Lanin – Los Angeles (+1 310.552.8581, alanin@gibsondunn.com) Michael Piazza – Houston (+1 346.718.6670, mpiazza@gibsondunn.com) John M. Pollack – New York (+1 212.351.3903, jpollack@gibsondunn.com)~~Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance: Elizabeth Ising – Washington, D.C. (+1 202.955.8287, eising@gibsondunn.com) Julia Lapitskaya – New York (+1 212.351.2354, jlapitskaya@gibsondunn.com) James J. Moloney – Orange County (+1 949.451.4343, jmoloney@gibsondunn.com) Lori Zyskowski – New York (+1 212.351.2309, lzyskowski@gibsondunn.com)~~© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved. For contact and other information, please visit us at www.gibsondunn.com.~~Attorney Advertising: These materials were prepared for general informational purposes only based on information available at the time of publication and are not intended as, do not constitute, and should not be relied upon as, legal advice or a legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. Gibson Dunn (and its affiliates, attorneys, and employees) shall not have any liability in connection with any use of these materials. The sharing of these materials does not establish an attorney-client relationship with the recipient and should not be relied upon as an alternative for advice from qualified counsel. Please note that facts and circumstances may vary, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.~~Download PDF~~
Article Author
Ari Lanin, Monica K. Loseman, Brian M. Lutz, Mary Beth Maloney, Julia Lapitskaya, Colin B. Davis, Jonathan D. Fortney, Mark H. Mixon, Jr.
The Sponsor
